Home Site Map   Don's Page Contact Us


Maranatha Revival Crusade, PO Box 218, APPLECROSS, Western Australia   6953       


Main Menu


Contact Us
Don's Page
Site Map

New Postings


MRC Articles
Millennium Alert
Maranatha! Hope of Glory

Our World

Preparations for War
The New World Order
International Economic Order
Israel & US

God's Word








My dear Reader, Some people ask me, “Why do you focus so much on the Middle East?”  I reply, “Well, simply, because Israel and the Middle East are the Epicentre of God’s prophetic program for the last days.  That’s where the climax of the age will take place.  And it’s where the prophesied Global World War will begin, and end.”

It is not as though the Middle East troubles are the only things going on. There are troubles, uprisings and crises all over the world, and all these are also working together to set the stage for the new world demonic order that will bring the world to total disaster – at Armageddon.

But the Middle East will be the main focus of the Antichrist (the Beast). After annihilating many, he will invade Israel and thereafter, set himself up as “the god of the whole world.”  (Daniel 8:24-25; 11:42, 11:36-38. 2 Thessalonians 2:3-4)

John the Apostle was given a clear revelation of the end of the age:

“Then I saw the beast and the kings of the earth and their armies, assembled to make war against the Rider on the horse, and against His army. But the beast was seized, and with him the false prophet who had performed the signs in his presence, by which he deceived those who had received the mark of the beast and those who worshipped his image.

“These two were thrown alive into the fiery lake of burning sulphur. The rest were killed with the sword that came out of the mouth of the Rider on the horse, and all the birds were filled with their flesh.”  (Revelation 19:19-21)

Well, that’s the END of the story.  Before that day, however, there will be a “hell of a lot” going on. And by that I mean there will be seven years of “hell upon earth.” 

Well, that’s the END of the story.  Before that day, however, there will be a “hell of a lot” going on. And by that I mean there will be seven years of “hell upon earth.”     

And that’s why it is so important to focus on the Middle East’ -  it's going to be the core of the fiery furnace – the Great Tribulation.

There have been a terrible lot of forest fires in Australia over the past two months – sometimes dozens of fires all at the same time.  And firemen have worked tirelessly, and dangerously to “pluck brands” (people) out of many homes that burned down. And in Arizona, US, last July, nineteen well-trained fire-fighters were caught in a powerful inferno that roasted them alive.

And today, as the Middle East and the whole world, is being prepared for the “Mother of Holocausts,” God says, “I am not willing that any should perish.”  And He calls the fire-fighters to do their work of “plucking brands (souls) from the burning.” 

The fire-fighters are those who know the Gospel, and who are trained to use it to save souls.  That’s our task today, my dear saved reader.

“YHWH said to Satan, ‘YHWH rebuke you, Satan! Indeed, YHWH who has chosen Jerusalem, rebuke you! Is this not a brand plucked from the fire?’  (Zechariah 3:2)

“I overthrew some of you, as God overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah. And you were like a burning stick snatched from the blaze. Yet you have not returned to Me,’ declares YHWH.”   (Amos 4:11)

The LORD will definitely save many souls during the Great Tribulation, (Rev 7:14), but our job now is to save souls BEFORE the Tribulation begins. And we can save them, of course, by introducing them to the Saviour.

Y’shua the Messiah said:

“All that the Father gives Me will come to Me, and whoever comes to Me I will never cast away… For this is the will of Him who sent Me, that everyone who sees the Son, and believes in Him may have everlasting life; and I will raise him up at the last day.”  (John 6:37, 40)

“Therefore we are ambassadors for Messiah; it’s as though God is right here personally appealing through us.  We implore you on behalf of the Messiah; be reconciled to God!”  (2 Corinthians 5:20)

To any of my readers who do not know Y’shua, Jesus, as their Saviour; or who do not have a personal relationship with the Heavenly Father, I want to offer my small 32-page booklet, THE WAY TO GOD

It is a small, pocket size booklet, that will help you to know the Saviour. It’s free. Just drop a line, by post, or email, or call the closest MRC representative to you. (See addresses in our inside front cover.)  




2013 was the year for the American Secretary of State, John Kerry, to shine. Sadly, Mr Kerry is now known in diplomatic circles as, Mr Interim Agreement because of the partial deals he has produced concerning Iran’s nuclear program, and Syria’s chemical arsenal.

And he is trying at this very minute to achieve as least an “interim something” through the Palestinian-Israel talks. And Kerry is still trying to dazzle friends and foes alike, but along with his boss, Barack Obama, he is creating a climate of animosity on all sides. The US is not sitting squarely anywhere in the Middle East.

There are three main areas of upheaval and negotiations.


           “PEACE  TALKS”

John Kerry initiated new “peace talks” between Israel and the Palestinians in mid-2013. The talks were meant to be concluded within nine months.

For six months little was produced except more deeply entrenched positions on both sides.  Most of the talks were between the US & Palestinians, and the US & Israel.

The two leaders, Abbas and Netanyahu did not meet face to face, but the talks were left to negotiators on both sides, along with John Kerry and his envoy – Martin Indyk.

Six months were spent on sounding out the various positions with a view of presenting the two sides with a framework for an agreement that the two sides would need to accept “with reservations,” as a basis for a final deal by year’s end. (President Obama wants it all to be completed by the end of 2014.)

The “Kerry Plan” involves what the two sides should do, or not do, and claim, regarding the West Bank and its Settlements, Withdrawals, the Jordan Valley, Jerusalem, Refugees, and national Status. The exact details of the “framework” should be known by the end of February – unless Kerry postpones it to prevent a total disaster.

Indyk said the framework would present “no surprises” for the Israeli and Palestinian leaders, because he and Kerry have consulted closely with the leaders of both governments as they drafted the agreement. Netanyahu and Abbas would be expected to accept the agreement, with reservations, as the basis of continued negotiations.

But while waiting for the “framework” to be presented, a lot of angry rhetoric has broken out, not only between these two sides, but all round.

 During a recent Security Conference in Munich, the  

Palestinian negotiator, Saeb Erekat had a heated argument with Israeli Justice Minister Tzipi Livni (who is currently, Israel’s negotiator with the PA).

Erekat accused Israel of being a “racist regime” that the world should rise up against and punish, as he reiterated that the Palestinians will never recognise Israel as a Jewish state - a key Israeli demand during the current peace talks.

Interestingly, Erekat claimed he has descended from the Biblical Canaanites who “lived in the region 5,500 years before Joshua Bin-Nun came and burned my hometown Jericho.”  Oh!  So now we know—the “Palestinians” are actually Canaanites!

(Canaanites are descendants of Canaan, the son of Ham and grandson of Noah.  Canaan is the father of Sidon, his firstborn; and of the Hittites, Jebusites, Amorites, Girgashites, Hivites, Arkites, Sinites, Arvadites, Zemarites, and the Hamathites.)


A group called “Rabbis from the Committee to Save the Land and People of Israel” sent a letter to John Kerry, warning him to end his "antagonism" towards Israel. The rabbis sharply criticized Kerry for his plans to establish an Arab capital in Jerusalem, and to have Israel withdraw to the 1949 Armistice lines. 

"Your incessant efforts to expropriate integral parts of our Holy Land and hand them over to Abbas’s terrorist gang, amount to a declaration of war against the Creator and Ruler of the universe, the rabbis' letter charges.



Various Govt. ministers and Knesset members are getting anxious, and angry, because the US and EU are putting enormous pressure on Israel to say “yes” to the American crafted “peace plan”; and also because of perceptions that Netanyahu may be seriously thinking of agreeing to deeply painful and enormously controversial concessions, including dividing Jerusalem and rolling Israel back to her pre-1967 borders.

Others attacked Kerry for saying there would be an international boycott of Israel, and a new violent Palestinian intifada (uprising), and an increased isolation from the global community, if Israel refuses to sign up to his plan.

Some insinuated that Kerry has in fact instigated the boycott threat to press Israel into surrendering to his plan.

Another very real effect of such statements is that they encourage a dangerous trend in the news media.   There is, in fact, a growing …


“There can be no denying that over the years since Israel became a sovereign state, there has been a corresponding growth of anti-Semitism. This has resulted in the increasing isolation of Israel – both by Arab states, and even by former reliable allies like the US.

“There is now a general global bias in favour of the Palestinian cause, as opposed to Israel’s right to exist.

“Also evident is a growing media bias that resists any form or pro-Israel sentiment – even when carefully balanced between the Israel and the Palestinian cause.

“It would seem that the day when Israel will be totally isolated is being hastened by the effects of biased media reporting.

“Facts will undoubtedly continue to be obscured and distorted to help achieve this end as soon as possible.”

Without waiting for the Palestinian-Israeli “peace talks” to wind down by the end of April, Mahmoud Abbas, was deep into plans to enlist 63 international organizations for a massive anti-Israel boycott.  

And in Australia, certain Greens and others are seeking to boycott and force Jewish shops to close, simply because they have connections with Israel.

Foreign Minister, Julie Bishop, has strongly condemned the global anti-Israel BDS movement *:

It’s anti-Semitic. It identifies Israel out of all other nations as being worthy of a *Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions campaign?  Hypocritical beyond belief.”

Meanwhile, parts of the EU have been boycotting Israeli goods produced in the West Bank.  Now two of the largest banks in northern Europe have announced they will boycott Israeli banks because they operate in “occupied territories.”

The two banks are the Swedish Nordea Bank (the largest bank in Scandinavia), and the Norwegian Danske Bank (the largest bank in Denmark).

Last month, Danske Bank included the Israeli bank, Bank Hapoalim in its boycott list.  These are not decisions of the governments of Denmark and Sweden against Israel, but decisions of private, large influential companies.

Remember, before Adolph Hitler   could round up the Jewish people and send  them to Auschwitz and other death camps, in cattle trains, he began to strangle them with an economic boycott: 

"Kauft nicht bei der Juden"

(Buy nothing from Jewish shops.)

Today we hear, even in the West, many voices, including some Christian denominations, calling for the boycott of Israel or Israeli goods.


  NETANYAHU   Various Israeli ministers lashed out at Benjamin Netanyahu for suggesting that the settlements could live under the new Palestinian govt.

Of course the PM knows perfectly well that no Jew would willingly live under the Palestinians; and he is regularly reminded that Abbas is emphatic that not one Jew will live in the Palestinian state. 

Netanyahu’s proposal was obviously a ploy – a challenge to Abbas – “if you won’t accept a single Jew, why should we continue to house a million Arabs (Palestinians) in Israel. Why should we not send them back to ‘Palestine’?” Of course, hardly a single Arab Israeli would like to surrender his Israeli citizenship with all its benefits.

The reason Abbas and Co adamantly refuse to recognise Israel as a Jewish state, is because they still claim that the territory occupied by Israel is part of Palestine, and the Jews should be driven out of the Palestinians’ land.  They do not see “two neighbour states living in a peaceful relationship,” as the solution to their goals.

The question then is; Why should Israel recognise “Palestine” as a Palestinian state? 

Can two states living alongside each other, without recognising each other, survive?  Yes, they can, but how would Palestine flourish, if it has no connections with Israel?  The shared water sources are just one issue.




PA leader, Mahmoud Abbas, has proposed that a US-led NATO force take over security in a future Palestinian state indefinitely throughout the territory, at all crossings, and in Jerusalem.

Israel has rejected this proposal asking; “Would these foreign contingents fight their way through the alleys of the Bethlehem or Jenin refugee camps, to chase down Hamas and Jihad Islami terrorists? And if not, would you let Israeli troops cross the border to do the job?”


John Kerry has managed to escalate tensions not only between Israel and the Palestinians, but also between Jordanians and the Palestinians inside Jordan. Jordan's government officials and ordinary citizens have come out against Kerry's proposals for reaching a peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinians.

The Jordanians fear that such an agreement would be concluded at their expense, and would undermine King Abdullah's rule. Their biggest fear is that Kerry is seeking to "resettle" Palestinian refugees in Jordan, effectively turning the kingdom into a Palestinian state. Palestinians already constitute more than half of Jordan's population.

More than 2,000 Jordanians from various political groups gathered in Amman on Feb 2 to condemn Kerry's "malicious conspiracy."

Protesters claimed that Kerry's proposals are aimed at "liquidating" the Palestinian cause and ending the Israeli-Arab conflict without granting the Palestinians their full rights, including the "right of return" to Israel.

A group of retired Jordanian army generals issued a statement warning their government against accepting Kerry's proposals. The retired generals expressed fear that the proposals were designed to "settle" Palestinians in Jordan.

"Jordan is going through a dangerous historic moment," the statement read. "This is an American-Zionist plot to liquidate the Palestinian cause at the expense of Jordan."

Jordanian journalist, Fatin al-Baddad, says: "Jordan is playing host [to Palestinians] and no agreement can pass without Jordan."


                     1994 PEACE TREATY WITH ISRAEL

According to debkafile's Middle East sources reveal that Jordan’s King Abdullah II has filed a strong protest with Kerry against the failure of the security-political clauses in his framework accord to address issues involving the Hashemite Kingdom's political future and security.  Above all, he castigated the plan for failing to factor in past treaties concluded between Jordan and Israel with US encouragement.

The security arrangements Kerry proposes (in a future Palestinian state) for the Jordan Valley, which marks Jordan's Western border, would replace Israeli border units with a system of electronic surveillance devices including drones, satellites and other instruments for securing the Jordanian border.


Israel emphatically objects to withdrawing its troops from this strategic valley on its eastern border, or evacuating its settlements there, on the grounds that without its own military manpower on the ground, even the most sophisticated instruments of surveillance would not be adequate to detect terrorist incursions to the West Bank and Israel itself.

This danger has become more acute since the radical jihadist ISIL seized territory in western Iraq, and also maintains offshoots in Jordan.

Therefore, Israel was not alone in vehemently ruling out the US plan. It is now joined by Jordan.


1. The proposed electronic surveillance system along its Western border would expose the entire Kingdom of Jordan to US surveillance. The same argument would apply to the Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas's latest proposal for the deployment of NATO forces.

2. On no account does Amman want to see Palestinian forces of any kind strung along the Jordan River border. This objection was underscored in a series of messages to Washington.

3. Another issue is the US approach to the Jerusalem question, which ignores Jordan's status with regard to the Holy Places, especially Temple Mount.

The monarch drew Kerry's attention to the peace treaty signed in 1994 between his father, the late King Hussein and Israeli Prime Minister, the late Yitzhak Rabin, which formally recognized Jordan's special status on Temple Mount.

King Abdullah is demanding the enshrinement and incorporation of these two documents in all the proposals the US Secretary puts before Israel and the Palestinians.

4.  He further emphasizes that any solution of the Palestinian refugee problem - however minimal - must not overlook the large Palestinian refugee community living in Jordan - which has grown to an estimated 2 million, out of the kingdom's total population of 7 million.

Kerry will now have to find a way to calm King Abdullah and his constituents before Jordan slips into civil war. So far Kerry has responded by ordering a reassessment of the security blueprint.


NO!  NO!  NO!

Hal Lindsey comments: John Kerry is so obsessed with the Palestinian/Israeli peace process that he's not even listening to the Palestinians. If he did, he'd probably turn around and go home.

In a fiery speech from his Ramallah headquarters, President Abbas proclaimed that there would be . . .

* NO giving up the Palestinian "right of return"

* NO recognizing Israel as a Jewish State; and

* NO concessions over Jerusalem.

Mahmoud Abbas should have added there will be ….

NO peace in our generation.

Many analysts have felt for the past year that Kerry’s frenzied efforts to jump-start the Israeli-Palestinian peace process are going nowhere, and are doomed to failure.

The latest reports suggest the Israel-Palestinian talks may go on for another two years. But the more likely possibility is that the “negotiations” will totally break down, as there is no indication that either side is willing to compromise on “red line” issues.

For example, one latest news, (Feb 12), reports a Palestinian official saying:


FEB 11. Palestinian Religious Affairs Minister, Mhd al-Habash, says there will be no peace agreement with Israel unless all territories Israel captured in 1967, including the Western Wall, are moved under the sovereignty of a future Palestinian state.

"Every centimetre that was occupied in 1967 is part of the Palestinian state, including the blessed Al Aqsa mosque, including the Buraq (Western) Wall.  And, there will not be peace without Jerusalem being the capital of Palestine.

john kerry’s efforts for israel-palestinian peace

threatens to become a disaster!





ON August 21, when rockets packed with suffocating Sarin nerve gas hit the suburbs of Damascus, the footage of children gasping in agony generated international condemnation. In response to what was believed to be the Syrians regime’s use of chemical weapons, President Obama threatened a severe military retaliatory strike on the Bashar Assad regime.

  In September, as Western politicians sought to win support for an attack, Syria made a swift concession. While blaming the rebels for launching the attacks, President Bashar Assad agreed to sign a Russian-brokered deal to surrender his entire chemical stockpile to international inspectors, to be destroyed. 

The promised attack was then called off, and the threat of air strikes disappeared.

The handover of Assad’s chemical weapons was to be completed by the end of 2013, but by the end of December only 4% had been turned over.

On 7 January, nine containers, containing 16 tonnes of material, were loaded onto a Danish cargo ship, and a Norwegian vessel collected a similar quantity on 27 Jan.

A new deadline, February 5, was set for Assad to sacrifice his complete chemical arsenal. 1,300 tonnes of chemicals was supposed to be shipped out of the country, but this deadline also slipped by with no significant movement on the Syrian side. According to the US, just a tiny fraction - estimated at less than 5% - has been handed over.

Assad has been accused of playing a diplomatic poker game, and as the mission nears stalemate, suspicions are growing that the deal was a canny plot designed to buy time and avert military intervention.

International patience is now running out, and tempers are rising once more.

Kerry says the Assad regime’s non-compliance with the US-Russian timetable for shipping his chemical arsenal out of the country will have consequences … issues of non-compliance will be referred to the Security Council.

Russia has now given Western nations the “assurance” that Syria will soon ship more chemical arms and toxic agents abroad for destruction under the deal to eliminate its chemical weapons arsenal.


In the meantime, talks began in mid-January in an effort to find a political solution of the Syrian conflict. At first the opposite sides would not sit together. Later they sat in the same room, but would not talk directly – only addressing the negotiation chairman.  Finally the . . .


JAN 30. The Geneva meeting wound up without results.  The warring Syrian government and opposition delegations agreed, for once, to observe one minute’s silence together in honour of the war dead of both sides. They agreed on nothing else, and went their separate ways.

The regime showed no interest in further talks, but after Russia has offered assurances that the Syrian government would attend, a new round of talks began on February 10.  This time there was a seat at the table provided for an Iranian delegation after Washington abruptly changed its objection to Iranian representatives being presence at the talks.

The second round of talks ended on Feb 15, again without any progress. The times ahead look increasingly alarming.

In the meantime the war continues.

The civil war has three main mutual enemies.

1. The Shi’ite government of Bashar Assad is backed by Iran and Hizb’ullah.

2. The Sunni rebels fighting for the overthrow of Assad who has become a ruthless dictator. These “moderate” Sunnis have been backed by Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Turkey. 

3. The radical Islamic forces working for a Sharia regime. These forces are backed by al Qaida.

This third group is spearheaded by groups including the ISIL — an offshoot of al-Qaida.

There are more than 7000 fighters from 50 countries who have joined the fierce battle in Syria.

Each of the three groupings has control over various areas in Syria. But they are all fighting each other to take over, or to retain, strategic areas.

Well, look what else is going on now:




FEB 1. Jerusalem Post, quoting The Sunday Times: “Israeli and Russian sources claim that Bashar Assad is stock-piling weapons of mass destruction in his Alawite stronghold region between Latakia and Turkey on the west coast of Syria.

“The Latakia region is now totally fortified and isolated from the rest of Syria."  Assad wants a protected “state” in case Syria is split and he is ousted from Damascus.

The sources report that this work has been ongoing even during the first round of peace talks between Assad's regime and the rebels in Geneva. 


The Syrian government has used controlled explosives and bulldozers to raze thousands of residential buildings, in some cases entire neighbourhoods, in a campaign that appeared designed to punish civilians sympathetic to the opposition or to cause disproportionate harm to them, according to an international human rights group. At least 140,000 people have been killed in the past two years.

An American military strike on Syria would now be very dangerous as Russia is backing Assad and is strongly resisting any attempt to remove him as Syria’s president.

The Syrian "Peace Process," like the Palestinian - Israel “Peace Talks” seems to be “dead in the water.” 




Iran’s quest for nuclear power has been a decades-long pursuit. While always claiming it wants nuclear power for peaceful purposes, the regime has at the same

time, developed long range ballistic missiles capable of carrying nukes that can be lodged on targets thousands of miles away.

All the talks and negotiations between Iran and the International atomic agency and world powers had drawn a blank. 


In mid-2013, Iran’s newly-elected president – Hassan Rouhani, was presented to the world as a “moderate.” This raised a hope that Iran could perhaps be entering a new “moderate” stage.

President Obama sent a letter of congratulations to President Rouhani.  This gesture, it seems, sparked a welcomed Iranian response.

After a complete breakdown between the US and Iran for 34 years, the new communications brought a sudden change in America’s turbulent relationship with Iran.

Soon an Obama-Rouhani plan began to take shape.

In September, in his first interview as president with a US news outlet, Rouhani declared that his administration will never develop nuclear weapons, and emphasised that he had full authority to make a deal with the West regarding the disputed atomic program.

A video last year, however, showed Rouhani taking pride in deceiving the West.


In October, Hassan Rouhani went to the UN General Assembly with a charm offensive, seeking to portray a “new Iran” that was willing to work with the nations for global peace. 

President Obama said that Iran’s new President appears to want to open a dialogue with the US, and that he (Obama) was willing to test Iran’s willingness to talk.

It wasn’t long before Iran announced that it was willing for new talks on its nuclear program. And soon talks began in Geneva.


On Nov 24, Iran and the Group P5+1 (the 5 UN permanent Security Council members –US, UK, France, Russia and China + Germany) came up with a Joint Plan of Action to lay the groundwork for the full resolution of the West’s decade-old dispute with Iran over its nuclear energy program.

Under a landmark deal, Iran agreed to roll back parts of its nuclear drive for six months. Iran also pledged to limit uranium enrichment to 5%. It also agreed to neutralise its stockpile of medium-enriched material, which is relatively easy to convert to the weapons-grade level of 90% or above.

Further, Iran also committed not to make further advances at its Fordo, Natanz and Arak enrichment facilities.

In exchange for this “confidence-building bid” to limit its nuclear activities, the six world powers agreed to lift some of the existing sanctions against Tehran, and to continue talks with Iran to settle all problems between the two sides.

As weeks went by with little progress, there were strong calls for an …


So on January 12, Iran and the 5+1 signed a new agreement that set out a timetable for the implementation of the Nov. 24 deal.

The Joint Plan of Action went into effect on January 20.

Under the deal, Iran is to freeze most of its nuclear enrichment capability, and not install or start up additional centrifuges or use next-generation centrifuges.

In return, the US, Germany, Russia, England, France and China will provide Iran with $7 BILLION in economic sanctions relief.   Iran is to permit new and more frequent inspections of its nuclear sites.  

US officials said that Iran would be allowed to continue existing research and development projects, but not to advance research with new projects.

Iranian Deputy FM Abbas Araqchi, however, implied that the program  would have wide latitude. No facility will be closed; enrichment will   continue, and qualitative and nuclear research will be expanded,” he said. “All research into a new generation of centrifuges will continue.”

The White House was upbeat. A statement (Jan 12) said: “From January 20, Iran will, for the first time start eliminating its stockpile of higher level enriched uranium and dismantling some of the infrastructure that makes such enrichment possible.”

President Obama said: “Taken together, these and other steps will advance our goal of preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. “We want to give diplomacy a chance, and give peace a chance."

            IRAN SAYS IT IS


At last, senior officials said that Iran had begun suspending its most advanced nuclear enrichment as part of a deal with world powers from which Tehran is expecting positive economic changes with the lifting of sanctions.

Inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency confirmed Iran had actually started the suspension.

In response, the 28-nation European Union agreed to lift some punitive restrictions immediately to facilitate trade in petrochemicals and precious metals and the provision of insurance for oil shipments.  -  New York Times / Jan 20

So does all this mean that Obama’s gamble is going to pay off - that Iran has had a change of heart?  That Israel and the world can now sleep soundly again? Or is it merely another ploy in the plot of the Prince of Persia?  A change of tactics?

Take a careful look at developments since then ...



   JAN 23. Iranian FM, Mhd Javad Zarif, insisted that the Obama administration mischaracterizes concessions by his side in the six-month nuclear deal with Iran, telling CNN in an exclusive interview that "we did not agree to dismantle anything."

The deal mandated that Iran halt all enrichment above 5% and "dismantle the technical connections required to enrich above 5%," according to a White House fact sheet issued in November after the initial agreement was reached.

Javad Zarif repeated that "we are not dismantling any centrifuges, we're not dismantling any equipment, we're simply not producing, not enriching over 5%."

Centrifuges are machines that spin to enrich the uranium. Hundreds of the machines are needed to process large quantities.          




No permanent agreement with Iran over its nuclear program will be possible if Tehran continues to insist it will not dismantle a single centrifuge, asserts the Israeli Prime Minister.

Iran’s nuclear goals are not a grave concern for Israel only, because of the threat to its survival; Saudi Arabia and other Arab nations are alarmed also, because of the threats they will face from a nuclear-empowered Iran.


With the implementation of the interim nuclear deal, world powers have surrendered to Iranian interests, Hassan Rouhani said on Jan 14.

He said Iran’s relationship with the world is based on its national interests, and that the agreement reached in Geneva marked a global surrender to Iran’s “national will.”

The US brushed off the remark. White House press secretary Jay Carney simply said, “The Iranians are describing the agreement in a certain way for their domestic audience.”



The Iranian President faces a crucial year that could possibly  produce a historic détente between the Islamic Republic and “The Great Satan,” (US), and possibly end 35 years of fierce confrontation. But that possibility is already dramatically altering the Middle East's geopolitical landscape.

US relationships with traditional allies such as Egypt, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Israel will be strained in-definitely. The Saudis and the Gulf states are no longer sure that America will maintain its military presence in the area to secure the flow of oil.

And apart from the temporary standoff with Iran, Obama's “détente” makes war with Iran inevitable.

But Rouhani’s biggest challenge is likely to be his efforts to win over the pampered and elite Iranian Revolutionary Guards (IRGC).  The IRGC military force was created by AYATOLLAH KHOMEINI in 1980, to protect the fundamentalist regime. It now wields immense economic as well as political power in Iran.


There was a storm of protest recently, from IRGC chiefs when Foreign Minister Javad Zarif, (who negotiated the ground-breaking interim agreement on Iran's nuclear program), said Iran should take the military threat posed by the US seriously, as the US has little to fear from Tehran's military defences.

Stressing that diplomacy rather than military confrontation will benefit Iran, Zarif declared: "Do you think the US, which can destroy all our military systems with one bomb, is scared of our military system?"

The IRGC commander, Maj-Gen. Mhd Jafari, who answers only to the Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, accused Zarif of betraying the Islamic Republic and of being "infected by Western doctrine."

The 125,000-strong IRGC is the most powerful military force in Iran, and Rouhani, a long-time insider, has been careful not to provoke the Guards, or Khamenei, too far, (as Ahmadinejad had done, and fell, because he challenged Khamenei's authority.)

Even so, Rouhani has openly called on the Guards to stay out of politics, using Khomeini's own ruling that they should not be politicized.

But Jafari and his top men all oppose any agreement that would weaken the Islamic Republic's military capabilities. 

Zarif seems a little more moderate than most Iranian leaders. Early this month, he was rebuked for suggest-ing on German television, that Iran could consider recognizing Israel “once the Palestinian problem has been solved.”

(Oh! Zarif could lose his head for suggesting such a thing!)

The state-run Mehr news agency reported that Zarif will be questioned by Iranian lawmakers upset over his “unauthorized” comments. Mehr quoted a parliament-tarian as saying that Zarif's statement was "inconsistent with the principles upheld by the system," and that Zarif was not authorized to comment about the "Zionist regime."

ð US  &  IRAN ï


JAN 27. John Kerry seems to have lit a new fuse when according to the Jerusalem Post, Kerry, stated (on 6th of Feb) that if Iran did not abide by its commitments with world powers, “the military option of the United States is ready and prepared to do what it would have to do.

If Kerry’s warning was intended to goad Iran into compliance, it produced the opposite — a defiant backlash.

Iran's Revolutionary Guard’s head, Mhd Jafari, threatened the US with a strong military response. 

"You could never understand the extent of the invasive capacity of the Islamic Republic of Iran,” he said. “Mr. Kerry must know that direct battle with the US is the biggest dream of pious and revolutionary people across the world. Your threats offer our revolutionary people the best opportunity," he said. 



The Jerusalem Post has published an alarming report that says Iran's parliament will, by a large majority, vote down what its own President Rouhani reluctantly agreed upon with the P5+1 in Geneva, thus accelerating the prospects of Iran obtaining its much desired nuclear capability.

It reminds one of the equal stupidity of the Western powers who trusted Adolf Hitler    when he promised British PM, Neville Chamberlain, in München, that he would not attack Czechoslovakia - a promise he never intended to keep.

When Iran is at the very brink of being able to carry out a nuclear attack on Israel, and while, like Hitler, it has never made secret of its desire to eliminate the Jewish state; today's foolish western nations (US & EU) have been beguiled, in Geneva, into making a deal with the Hitler-like regime, which Iran’s own parliament is likely to dishonour! 

Even should the US Senate and Congress vote for new sanctions against Iran, it may already be too late to turn back the clock. Iran, by giving up little, has already beaten the sanctions.



Russia and Iran are about to sign an oil-for-goods trans-action worth $1.5 billion a month - $18bn a year - that would substantially help lift Iran’s oil exports out of range of Western sanctions and give Iran a major edge in the ongoing nuclear negotiations. -  DEBKAfile / Jan 11, 2014.

With sanctions already being eased, other nations have renewed trading with Tehran. This, in reality, speeds up Iran’s intention of finishing off the Jews.


Amid its new dealings with the US, Iran has disclosed its strategy to establish an insurgency presence in all countries that are adjoining Israel.

  Gen. Mhd Reza Naqdi, says that Tehran is working with proxies in the Levant to establish militias to attack Israel from countries including Egypt and Jordan.

(The Levant - refers to the eastern Mediterranean area - Cyprus, Lebanon, Syria, Palestine, Jordan, Sinai and Israel.)

Naqdi says: “Today Israel is surrounded by resistance movements. Following the Basij (fighting force) in Palestine and Lebanon, the Syrian Basij was formed. Now the Jordanian and Egyptian Basij will follow.  Iran will establish units of the Basij throughout the Levant.”

The Basij forces are being assigned “internal and border security,” and have been sponsored by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

The remarks by the general on Jan. 14 contrasted with that by Iran’s new president Hassan Rouhani who, over the last few months, assured the West that Iran did not have any hostile designs on the Middle East.   -


Israeli head of military intelligence, Gen. Aviv Kochavi says Israel's abilityto deter enemies is strong, “but there is still a challenge - the state of Israel is surrounded with active enemies. We call this period in time the "Era of Fire” in light of the amount of missiles and rockets we  face as a constant threat. There are about 170,000 rockets  and missiles that threaten Israel," he said. "For the first time the enemy now has the ability to hit Israeli cities hard." - 


The Fatah party of Palestinian Authority Chairman Mhd Abbas has posted threats to Tel Aviv on its official Facebook page. The threats came in the form of a video by Fatah's armed wing - the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade - which threatened to turn Tel Aviv "into a ball of fire," and escalate rocket fire on Israeli civilians.




According to Fox News’ National Security Analyst, Kathleen McFarland, Iran is set to become the dominant economic, military and political power in the Middle East. Thanks to the nuclear agreement struck by Obama and John Kerry, Iran will now be in a position to control the world's exported oil. 

As the sanctions against Tehran are relaxed, Iran's economy is gaining a major boost – without a commitment by the country to stop its production of enriched uranium .... Iran is now, both improving its economy with the removal of sanctions, and by continuing its nuclear development program.

The deal with the Persian nation makes it clear the US is leaving the region, and leaving Iran in charge," McFarland wrote.

With extra money coming in as oil sales are resumed, Iran's coffers will soon be strong enough to resume funding of terrorist groups throughout the region."

In addition, as Iran's nuclear program continues, its neighbours will treat it as a de facto nuclear weapons state.  

The Iran deal is just one of many foreign policy blunders by the White House, McFarland wrote. 

"Here's my prediction," she added ominously. "The agreement with Iran will be hailed as a breakthrough ... But then, so was Neville Chamberlain's deal with Adolf Hitler in Munich ... at least for a while.”   - www.israel national / Jan 16/2014. 


The Los Angeles Times has reported the existence of a "secret side deal,” a 30-page document that spells out understandings between the US and Iran that are not included in the official nuclear deal.

The LA Times indicates that according to the "secret deal," worked out by the Obama administration:

*  not a single Iranian nuclear facility will be shut down.

*  Iran will continue to enrich uranium “legally” to 5%.

*  Iran's nuclear research operations will actually expand;

*  new, state-of-the-art centrifuges will be allowed.

Whether the report of the secret deal is accurate, and is the full picture, remains to be seen. But it does exist, at least in the minds and intentions of the Iranian leaders?

The existence of the “non-paper” was leaked by Abbas Araqchi, Iran's chief negotiator.

He could not keep a secret, so determined was he to

declare that Iran has the "right" to continue nuclear research and development, and that this “has been acknowledged by the US.”

Initially the State Department and the White House denied the existence of any such document. Finally, they said there was no secret agreement, and that the details of the “non-paper” would be disclosed because they were really "technical plans submitted to the International Atomic Energy Agency.”

Ray Takeyh, an Iran specialist at the Council on Foreign Relations, said Iran and the other six countries may have written the non-paper to record understandings that they didn’t want to release publicly.


JAN 28. Benjamin Netanyahu says, “the whole world knows Tehran is after nukes; and in fact it could build a nuclear weapon in as little as six weeks. “Although there are internal disagreements in Iran, there is no dispute in the regime about developing nuclear weapons and the goal of wiping Israel off the map,” he told the crowd at a conference in Tel Aviv.

“The interim agreement in Geneva left Iran, according to our assessment, six weeks from a nuclear weapon, and therefore by our estimation, the true test will be the permanent agreement, if such an agreement can be reached,” he said.  - Times of Israel 


FEB 9. "Iranian naval fleets are sailing towards the Atlantic Ocean to deploy on  America’s borders. Iranian media reported that two ships -- a destroyer and a helicopter transport vessel -- had been dispatched on January 21. 

Admiral Afshin Rezayee Haddad said, "Iran's military fleet is approaching the United States' maritime borders, and this move has a message!"

The new moves come as Tehran has taken an increasingly belligerent tone with the US, despite President Hassan Rouhani's "charm offensive."

Iran's parliamentary speaker Ali Larijani referred to Israel as a "cancer" in the region, and accused it and the US of trying to "sterilize" the Arab Spring revolutions.

Iran's Revolutionary Guards have also threatened that its drones and missiles could hit US warships in the Persian Gulf.

Iran's defiant stance toward America did not end at sea. The supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said American officials are "lying" when they say they are not seeking regime change in Iran. Their officials tell us at talks that they are not after regime change in Iran. But they are lying because they won't hesitate a moment if they had the ability to do so," he said.

The Iranians are certain the US will not strike back at their naval deployment for fear of disrupting the ongoing nuclear diplomatic track.

Meanwhile, Benjamin Netanyahu said that the easing of sanctions of Iran has not prompted a change of behavior by Iran.

“The dispatch of the warships was clear evidence of Iran's aggression, and is proof that Tehran has not moderated its policies following the landmark deal with world powers to roll back its nuclear programme in exchange for sanctions relief. The easing of sanctions against Iran by the international community has not caused Iran to moderate its international aggression - the complete opposite has occurred," Netanyahu told the weekly cabinet meeting in remarks relayed by his office.

The Next Iranian Nuclear Talks Were Scheduled for February 18.

Javad Zarif, came to the talks vowing that Iran would never strip down its nuclear facilities. Nothing much happened, except, as Catherine Ashton, the EU’s top diplomat said: “We have … identified all of the issues we need to address for a comprehensive and final agreement.”  And then they decided that the next round of negotiations would begin in Vienna on March 17 -  continuing a process likely to take at least six months and probably longer.

Now let’s look again at the Scriptures, and see the END of the Russian-Persian saga.



In this prophecy Persia is included in the northern alliance of nations, led by Rosh (Russia), that will come against Israel early in the Tribulation.


EZEKIEL 38:5-6, 10-11, 15-16 

PERSIA (Iran), Cush (Sudan - Ethiopia), and Put (Libya) will be with them, all with shields and helmets; Gomer with all its troops; and the House of Togarmah from the far north with all its troops -  

(Turkey & the Turkic people of Central Asia)  -

many nations with you.”

 “You will devise an evil plan.  You will say;

‘I will invade the land of unwalled villages;

I will attack those who are at rest and live securely.’ 

“Then you will come from your place out of the remote parts of the north, you and many peoples with you, all of them riding on horses, a great company and a mighty army; and you will come up against My people Israel like a cloud, to cover the land - it will be in the last days. I will bring you against My land,

in order that the nations may know Me, when

I am sanctified in you before their eyes, O Gog.”

RUSSIA is making a spectacular comeback in the Middle East where a new race for nuclear weapons is about to begin. And while Russia’s influence is on the rise, the influence of the United States is diminishing.



                               THE NORTHERN CONFEDERATION.

* It is Persia that conquered Jerusalem in 614 AD.

* It is Islamic Iran, whose Shi’ite doctrine predicts the coming of the Imam Mahdi who will lead “holy armies” against Jerusalem, capturing the city, and establishing an Islamic Caliphate there.

* The demonic prince of Persia is the one inspiring the ayotollahs, and is endlessly striving to defeat Michael, the archangel of Yahweh the Almighty.

* The human prince of Persia, Hassan Rouhani, is adamant:

“The Zionist regime has been a wound on the body of the Islamic world for years, and the wound must be removed.”

Following in the train of Haman and Hitler, the Tehran Tyrants are plotting the complete annihilation of the Hebrew race, and of all who follow Yahweh-Y’shua, the Holy One of Israel and the Head of the Church.

Describing himself as a “prudent moderate,” President Rouhani assured the World Economic Forum in Davos (Jan 23), that his country has “no intention of acquiring nuclear weapons."  And of course we all believe him!

Then, in an interview with CNN, this same chief prince said Iran will "not under any circumstances" destroy any of its centrifuges that are used to enrich uranium. Even more broadly, he vowed, "We will not accept any limitations" on nuclear technology.

At the same Davos Forum, Benjamin Netanyahu asked:

“As a ‘prudent moderate,’ how does Rouhani justify sending arms and Hizb’ullah units to Syria, and financing terrorist networks across the world? Is this how the Iranian president conducts his avowed goals of peace and stability?”



Iran’s leaders celebrated the 35th anniversary of their Islamic revolution on Feb 11 with a torrent of hate rhetoric, and threats surpassing even the crudely belligerent language used by former President Ahmadinejad.

A common theme of their speeches to the masses was threats to the United States and Israel of defeat and annihilation at the hands of the invincible Iranian army.

Following the first deployment of Iranian warships - the helicopter carrier Khark and the Sabalan guided missile destroyer - near Americas Atlantic shores, the commander of the Revolutionary Guards fleet, Navy Commander Ali Fadayi, said:

“The Americans can sense… how their warships will be sunk with crews of 5,000 in combat against Iran, and how they would find their hulks in the depths of the sea.”

The Iranian officer pressed on to suggest “the Americans” were cowards, who “cannot hide themselves in the sea since the entire Middle East region, Western Europe, the Persian Gulf, the Sea of Oman and the Straits of Hormuz are monitored by us!”

The IRGC commander General Mohammad Ali Jafari piled it on with a boast that just two Basiji militiamen could sink one American aircraft carrier – a blatant threat of suicide attacks on US military targets.

Addressing the “Death to USA Grand Prize” ceremony in Tehran, Jafari continued to mock Washington by calling the American leaders’ references to a military option “ludicrous,” adding that “the Americans really cannot do a damn thing” against Iran’s military capability.”

Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei repeated the old mantra slamming Israel as “a cancerous growth” in the Middle East fit only to be “eradicated.”

As his audience burned US, British and Israeli flags, and stamped on placards depicting President Obama, Hassan Rouhani intoned: “I say to those delusional people who say the military option is on the table, that they should change their eye glasses.”

     [Rouhani should read Ezekiel 38/39].

His meaning was clear to his mass audience: Iran no longer faces any military threatseither from the United States or Israel.  - from a DEBKAfile Special Report

So much for Obama’s short-lived “love relationship” with Rouhani!


YES!  There is a conspiracy – an evil plot.

“And the conspiracy was strong.” 2 Samuel 15:12

- a conspiracy against the King, in David’s time.

And a conspiracy in our time, against the King of Kings.

The Battle is strong; the enemies are strong.

But the King of Kings is victorious!

“Who is the King of Glory?

YHWH strong and mighty,

YHWH mighty in battle.” Psalm 24:8





“For though we walk in the flesh as human beings, we do not wage war according to the flesh by using carnal and physical weapons; for the weapons of our warfare are not carnal and physical, but mighty in God for overthrowing strongholds, for refuting arguments and casting down every proud and lofty thing raised up against the knowledge of God, and for capturing every thought, and bringing it into obedience to the Messiah.”  (2 Corinthians 10:3-4)

Ezekiel indicates that Iran & the Confederation of Rosh will come to a violent end, possibly by instruments in their own hands, like Haman and Hitler did.

“And with pestilence and with bloodshed I shall execute judgment upon him; and I shall rain on him, and on his troops, and on the many peoples who are with him, a torrential rain, with hailstones and burning sulphur.”  (Ezekiel 38:22)

It is possible that the LORD will turn the nuclear weapons of Russia and Iran back upon their own heads. 

The Northern Confederation will be wiped out.

The story is unfolding before our eyes every day.

Watch the nations!  But more importantly, Look Up!


When these things begin to take place,

straighten yourselves and lift up your heads,

because your redemption is drawing near.” 

Luke 21:28

 # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 



“For the mystery of iniquity and lawlessness is

already at work.”  (2 Thessalonians 2:7)






AGENDA 21, or “Agenda for the twenty-first century,” is a globalist program of so-called “Sustainable Development.”

The document is 800 pages long, consists of 40 chapters, and is a comprehensive programme for the planning and management of the

economic and social development of the entire world during the twenty-first century.

Agenda 21 has been built on earlier efforts from Mikhail Gorbachev and Maurice Strong (Green Cross, Earth Council). Since then the plan has been implemented in the United States by Executive Orders, (bypassing Congress), by Presidents Clinton, H.W. Bush and Obama, and was adopted by 178 governments at the United Nations Rio Earth Summit in 1992.

The program uses falsehood to incite fear in populations, and it promotes Draconian (harsh, monstrous) changes to society - all under the guise of “protecting the future of humanity.”

Western economies are gradually being destroyed by globalist policies (open borders, ‘free’ trade, foreign ownership, food monopolies, etc), and the increasing need to control the populations of the world.

Under Agenda 21, national governments are committed to act as agents at national level for the UN in controlling virtually every aspect of society, including:

* control of patterns of human consumption (what people are allowed to eat).

* control of human habitats (where and how people are allowed to live).

* control of all future development worldwide.

* control of the composition of the atmosphere   (‘greenhouse gas’ emissions).

* control of  the management of land use (Vegetation Act, Desertification Treaty).

* control of the utilisation of forests.

* control of the development in mountainous areas.

* control of types and methods of agriculture (‘sustainable agriculture’).

* control of areas set aside to protect biological diversity            (Biodiversity Treaty).

* control of genetic engineering.

* control of the use of the oceans (limits on fishing,

    including recreational).

* control of the use of water, worldwide.

* control of the management of wastes (including toxic chemicals, hazardous wastes,  solid and radioactive wastes).



The world’s elite “insiders” maintain that the greatest problem on the planet is excessive human population; the world simply cannot sustain the rapidly-expanding billions of people with their increasing demand for more food, more water, more space, energy, technology, infrastructure, transport, hospitals, education centres and security, and a cleaner, safer environment!

The solution, to make life sustainable, they say, is population reduction.

The specific plan for Sustainable Development has been outlined by the United Nations. The plan calls for reduction of the human population by 85%.  Yes, you read that correctly. The powers-that-be within the framework of the United Nations believe that the population of planet earth must be reduced by 85%.  

That’s how they plan to save the world from implosion and disaster. But the highly organized undermining of society is actually preparing the nations for …  


To give you some idea of how the agenda is working:

The elite banking masters know that their ideas of ever-expanding ‘growth’ economies are totally flawed and that they are only designed for immense profit and ever-increasing control.

The financial foundations of the Western world are being threatened by international debt.  Individuals around the world are losing faith in their governments, and the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) no longer has any practical value in relation to the financial health of the population.

Sovereign governments should be able to lend money themselves, but the hijacking of their right has set the stage for a financial wipe-out in coming years. This is all part of the deception, and it is the reason why the globalists are making programs like Agenda 21.

Surrounding themselves with fine sounding words from globalist propaganda ‘think tanks’, debt laden governments are being manipulated into the New World Order noose.

To establish a world government, the New World Order insiders need to overcome and cripple the middle class which owns homes that have been a mainstay in the civilized free world.

Local governments have not escaped the trap, and greedy personal ambitions are often fertile soil for the poisonous seed of “sustainability.”  As with governments at federal and state levels, the Agenda 21 is a weapon at the local level where the International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives is seeking to spearhead the NWO objectives.

George Soros, financier and avowed enemy of the constitution of the United States, via his Open Society Institute, gave $2,147,415 to support local Agenda 21 initiatives in America.

There are, in fact, innumerable UN bodies and non-government organizations (NGO’s) working towards global control of national governments and populations.

The tactic of using Local Environmental Initiatives means direct influence by the UN on local government.  Such influence is completely unethical and is a dire threat to national sovereignty. Now, instead of supplying necessary services and infrastructure to our communities, our elected bodies have begun restricting and restraining legitimate progress on the basis of ‘sustainability.’

The policy of ‘sustainability’ and its oppressive policies are being implemented by local governments (sometimes induced by U N funds), and it is all being justified as essential to the unsuspecting public. The use of local government revenues against their constituents is scandalous, and every citizen should investigate if their local government is implementing sustainability programs. 



The target of Agenda 21 is particularly on the personal freedoms of the citizens of western democracies.

In many nations, the automobile provides great personal freedom. However, this aid to productivity (private transport) is deemed unsustainable by the likes of the U N and the New World Order controllers.

Though modern society has accepted the relatively small risk of accident or death that driving causes, the convenience of the car is being continually undermined, under the guise of personal safety.


  Roads are narrowed; parking access is reduced or becomes unreasonably expensive; unavoidable and small violations of road laws are harshly punished.

Agenda 21 regards state-owned, tall apartment buildings, “ghettos,” as the desirable human dwelling. And as unreasonable speed limits are imposed, people who commute long distances by non-public transport, will soon seek other employment closer to home.  Thus  personal movement is restricted.  

Whether it is child safety, the environment, animal well-being, or education, all these important considerations are subject to gross manipulation and distortion in the quest for control.

Psychology and propaganda are used to blacklist and silence those who object to the restrictions, or who call for a democratic and reasoned debate.

As the New World Order is a planned totalitarian (dictatorial) regime, like others of its kind in history, it also targets the young and those open to indoctrination.

Along with the globalist curricula in the education system, Agenda 21 makes willing participants of those who have the most to lose by its implementation. Youth can often be observed ridiculing the very society that nurtured, educated, protected and gave them their personal rights and freedoms.


(Gaia, Green Peace, etc.), in the guise of the Climate Change Fear Campaign, is a disguise for communist type restrictions including the undermining of personal property rights.

Those with larger properties will be restricted as to their use by the land being ‘zoned for endangered species’ or ‘needed for biodiversity.’

This may severely restrict the financial assets of the landholder and could lead to their bankruptcy.  It is like National Socialism (Nazi) ideology, where the state allowed personal ownership, but dictated its use within the nation.

In this way, the legal owners of personal property are subjected to harsh restrictions and unreasonable local government taxes. Financial compensation through legal means will be thwarted by additional Agenda 21 legislation at a state level.

The private farm owner will be hindered by the loss of productivity and may be forced to seek employment in a town or city. This will help in concentrating the population into high-density dwellings and opening up more arable land to the control of corporate agricultural monopolies, themselves controlled by the financial elite.

Because those who grow food and attain self-sufficiency could resist NWO/One World Government directives, they must be neutralized.

With restrictions on entry into wilderness areas, the scope of government control grows and personal liberties are curtailed.

People with possessions that are more modest, and who own family homes on separate allotments of land, can also be assailed with high taxation and restricted services.

Waste disposal charges are increased while the actual service is decreased. A restriction on the type and amount of waste disposal is legislated. This especially affects the elderly and those with large families.

Needless and unsound recycling regimes are often mandated. Genuine environmental action could be pursued with corporate manufacturers, but as they are trans-national tools to derive wealth for the elite and to create western unemployment, they escape logical consideration.

The U N’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPPC) recommendations are being instituted at the local level with initiatives to save energy. Advice and inspections are offered to help replace effective internal lighting with inferior energy saving bulbs (and as an excuse to enter private homes for possible future local government surveillance).

Needlessly, complex wind farms and solar panels are championed, as the destruction of base load power in the post-industrial West is already planned. Even highly negligent programs are discussed, such as reducing the number of street lights to save power.

This may give you some idea of “sustainability.”  But if you listen closely, you will hear of reports of the plan in progress in your society and country. Each example may not seem so significant in itself, but added to countless other restrictions, it becomes very ominous indeed.


It should be said that “making the earth sustainable,” or, “saving the earth from extinction” is a false concept – a false agenda.  Planet earth is not, and has never been, ‘sustainable’ – it was not created to last for ever. 

he Scripture – the Word of God - explains Earth’s destiny quite clearly:

“The earth will wear out like a garment.”  (Isaiah 51:6)

“But the Day of YHWH will come (unexpected) like a thief in the night, in which the heavens will disappear with a roar; and the elements will be destroyed with intense heat, and the earth and its works will be burned up.  “Since all these things are to be destroyed in this way, what kind of people ought you to be? You ought to live holy and godly lives as you look forward to and earnestly desire the Day of God (the Day of YHWH). That day will bring about the destruction of the heavens by fire, and the elements will melt in the intense heat.”         (2 Peter 3:10-12)

That’s the end of the world.  But it is not the end of God’s plans.  God has great plans for this world.  He has plans for a new eternal earth and universe – a truly righteous, incorruptible creation that will be inherently sustained by the inexhaustible life of God. 

At this present time, God is preparing a people for His eternal universe where they will share His glorious Home, His plans and Destiny for ever.

And the next verse in Second Peter says:

“In keeping with His promise, we are looking forward to new heavens and a new earth, in which righteousness dwells.” (2 Peter 3:13)

And through Isaiah, God says: “I create new heavens and a new earth. The former things will not be remembered, nor will they come to mind.”   (Isaiah 65:17).  Amen!


Anyone who has been observing the NWO trends and our technological advances, will notice that they are accelerating; and Agenda 21 is actually building the “Big Brother” infrastructure of the coming Antichrist.

When that Man of Sin is revealed, those who are deluded in their sinful ambitions will be totally deluded …

“For the mystery of iniquity and lawlessness is already at work; but He who now restrains will do so until He is taken out of the way.

“And then the lawless one will be revealed whom the Lord will slay with the breath of His mouth and bring to an end by the glory of His coming; that is, the one whose coming is in accord with the activity of Satan, with great power and with all kinds of signs and counterfeit miracles, and with all the deception of wickedness among those who are perishing, because they would not receive the love of the truth which could have saved them.

“And for this reason, God will send upon them a powerful delusion so that they will believe what is false, in order that they all may be condemned who did not believe the truth, but took pleasure in wickedness.”  (2 Thessalonians 2:7-12)

At this present time, there has never been a greater need for righteous government on earth, and the situation will continue to deteriorate right up to, and during, the Great Tribulation.

True righteous government will be established when the Lord Jesus Christ personally intervenes at the end of the 7-year Tribulation, bringing an end to the Mystery of Iniquity.

He will then establish the Kingdom of God on earth – the Kingdom for which we pray, as the Messiah taught us:

“Our Father in heaven, hallowed be Your Name.

Your kingdom come;

Your will be done on earth as it is in heaven.”

(Matthew 6:9-10)



 Please contact us if you would like a copy of       

the booklet, THE WAY TO GOD.   


UK:            …

Australia:    …

USA:           …


Contact us   ...    MRC ADDRESSES


 q q q q q




Expression Web Templates

The One who is coming will come, He will not delay